Underlength: The answer is only 105 words long, which is significantly shorter than the recommended length for a task like this.
Introduction is copied from task: The first sentence of the answer is almost an exact copy of the task prompt, which is not ideal. It is important to rephrase the prompt in your own words and add some additional information or analysis.
No comparison between figures: The answer simply lists the birth and death rates for different years, without making any meaningful comparisons between them. It is important to identify any significant changes or trends in the data and explain them.
No focus on general trends: The answer does not focus on any overall patterns or trends in the data, which is a key part of the task. It is important to identify any significant changes or shifts in the data over time.
No reference to the future: The task prompt includes a projection for future birth and death rates, but the answer does not make any reference to this. It is important to consider how the trends in the data might continue into the future.
Conclusion tries to explain information rather than summarise it: The final sentence of the answer tries to provide an explanation for the changes in birth and death rates, which is not necessary. The conclusion should simply summarise the key points and findings of the answer.
Poor linking of ideas (only done by time markers): The answer relies heavily on time markers to link different ideas together, without using any other cohesive devices. It is important to use a range of linking words and phrases to make the answer more coherent.
Limited range of grammar and vocabulary: The answer uses a very limited range of grammar and vocabulary, which is likely to limit the score. It is important to use a variety of sentence structures and vocabulary to demonstrate a good level of English proficiency.
Scoring High in IELTS Writing Task 1: An Exemplary Response to Graph Analysis
The presented graph showcases the alterations in birth and death rates in New Zealand from 1901 up to 2101, including projected trends. Commencing with the former, it is apparent that throughout the indicated period, the birth rate consistently exceeded the death rate. The rate began at a modest 20,000 and spiked at its zenith in 1961, where it peaked at 66,000. In the intervening years, it oscillated between 65,000 and 50,000 and is predicted to marginally decline to roughly 45,000 births by the close of this century.
In contrast, the death rate commenced at a level below 10,000 and has increased unceasingly up to the present day. This trend is projected to further accelerate from 2021 to 2051, where it is anticipated to stabilize at approximately 60,000, before dwindling slightly by 2101. These opposing trends suggest that the death rate may surpass the birth rate in approximately 2041, and the significant disparity between the two will reverse in the latter part of this century.
Overall, this graph highlights the noteworthy shifts in birth and death rates in New Zealand, particularly the stark contrast between the two. While the birth rate is experiencing a gradual decline, the death rate continues to surge upwards. The implications of this data are significant, particularly for policymakers, who must account for these fluctuations when planning for the future.
(164 words)